The evaluation created, the Emotional Competence Inventory assesses 20 emotional competencies.
It’s most likely currently occurred to you that someone who isn’t high in EQ would not examine their own EQ effectively because it takes understanding.
One of the scales on the ECI is called Accurate Self-Assessment and determines how mindful the individual is of their own strengths and weaknesses.
And, yes, it ends up in a research study done, that those who scored low in Accurate Self-Assessment had much bigger spaces in between their views of themselves and other’s views on them.
And this is fascinating– those who scored high in Accurate Self-Assessment rate themselves somewhat less mentally smart than they are viewed. And alternatively, those low in Accurate Self-Assessment tend to see them as more mentally intelligent than others do.
It is concluded that self-assessments alone could be misleading, and multi-rate evaluations would be preferred in evaluating emotional intelligence.
I believe one might also conclude that a coach is an essential part of the mix– to have the neutrality to collect the information, use the multi-rate assessments, observe the person in action, and assist them in learning with feedback.
The most significant outcome of the research study was that we aren’t good at evaluating our own psychological intelligence, and it follows that we likewise would not ready, alone, at altering it, observing the difference, and getting it right.